Nycrr refer to e filed documents in motion

Any additional facts relevant to the instant application are set forth below. A comprehensive recitation of the facts of this action is set forth in the decision and order of this Court entered June 30, 2021. After a review of the parties' contentions, as well as a review of the relevant statutes and case law, the motion is decided as follows. Plaintiff 67-69 Saint Nicholas A venue Housing Development Fund Corporation opposes the motion.

Green'), and A Cup of Harlem (collectively 'movants') move, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. X The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 004) 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93 were read on this motion to/for SUMMARY JUDGMENT In this action seeking, inter alia, declaratory relief, defendants Siwana Green ('Ms. _ _ _ 00_4_ _ Plaintiff, - V - SIWANA GREEN, THOMAS GREEN, A CUP OF HARLEM, ANTONIO CONTRERAS, DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendants.

NICHOLAS AVENUE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION, MOTION SEQ. 94 RECEIVED NYSCEF: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: 58 PART HON. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

Cohen Cases posted with a '30000' identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. v Green 2022 NY Slip Op 31597(U) Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No.

Nycrr refer to e filed documents in motion